Home  |  Contact Us  |  Sitemap
   
Data Base on Godavari Basin
Conserving the Forest
Tribal Land Rights
Governance of Natural Resources
G.O./N.G.O.
Chenchu Empowerment
Minimum Wages
Weighing Balances
Studies and Reports
Court Cases (PIL)
Protecting Human Rights
Disaster Preparedness
Noorinti Adavi
Evaluations
Bio-diversity
Photo Gallery
Tribal Culture
Publications
 
 
West Godavari District News
1995 - 1996 - 1997 - 1998 - 1999 - 2000 - 2001 - 2002 - 2004 - 2005 - 2007

Anomalies found in agency survey

February 13, 1997.

The Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee (APCLC) general secretary, Dr. K Balagopal and the West Godavari unit secretary, Mr. Vedangi Chittibabu in a statement here on Wednesday, said the committee members visited Reddiganapavaram village of Buttaigudem mandal on a fact finding mission found that about 100 acres of land now under enjoyment of non-tribals was originally under "podu" cultivation by the tribals. The police arrested tribal leaders before removal of crop in that land as alleged. They said the land survey in progress was defective. They alleged the survey was touching on only the occupations in the canal road and the waste lands and not the large non-tribal occupied lands. They demanded a survey of such lands under occupation of the non-tribals and giving due weight age to the witnesses being produced by the tribals.

Stage set for distribution of land to tribals

The Hindu, February 13, 1997.

From Our Staff Reporter

Eluru, Feb. 12: Stage has been set for the distribution of 202 acres of land among landless tribals at Reddyganapavaram village of Buttayagudem mandal on February 17 formally. The land includes 114 acres, at present occupied by non-tribals, 13 acres of vacant land and 76 acres, which is in the possession of tribals but without pattas. The land secured from non-tribals under the Land Transfer Regulation Act was 42 acres.

The District Collector, Mr. D. Ramakrishna, the Joint Collector, Mr. M. Subramanyam, and the superintendent of Police, Mr. M. Punna Rao, who visited Reddyganapavaram on Monday, held a meeting with the tribals and persuaded them to accept the first installment of land. Tribal leaders were asked to prepare a list of landless tribals as picking of beneficiaries by the revenue staff would give scope for suspicion and dissatisfaction.

The officials also visited kangalavarigudem, another tribal village, where tribals stalled the survey and prevented some of the non-tribal farmers from watering the fields, alleging fraud in the survey.

It is said that Mr. Balakrishna, a retired revenue official and activist of Sakthi, a voluntary body, had brainwashed the tribals of the village into believing that the survey was an eye wash and that they were entitled to more land. The Sakthi activist has not been seen for the last five days.

The survey teams identified 123 acres of land in Kangalavarigudem for allotment. Addressing the tribals, the Collector tried to drive home the point that only the Government was capable of providing land to them and that heeding to the advice of behind-the-curtain operators would land them in trouble and rob them of whatever land identified in the survey. The villagers presented a list of survey numbers measuring 50 acres claiming it as theirs.

900 acres identified

The survey resulted in identifying 900 acres for allotment in Jeelugumilli and Buttayagudem mandals. Will the present exercise of land distribution douse flames in the agency is a question difficult to answer. In the words of APCLC General Secretary, Dr. K. Balagopal, the survey does not quench the thirst of tribals for land and more needs to be done to do justice.

The main focus of tribals is on lands cultivated by non-tribals. The general feeling among a section of tribals and the groups leading them is that the administration is concentrating to gather Government wasteland rather than subjecting the ownership of non-tribals to scrutiny.

Mr. Madakam Venkateswara Rao, a tribal leader, complained to the Collector at Reddyganapavaram that about 200 acres had been occupied by non-tribals without valid document. A woman at Kangalavarigudem argued with the officials that a large extent of land in the village was cleared of forest and developed by their forefathers but it was being cultivated by tribals.

The CPI(M), which had taken part in the tripartite discussions, and other groups backing the stir had also come under criticism for their inactive role in the survey. The tribals had got a rare opportunity to review the deals of the entire land in the scheduled acre. In spite of an offer from the administration to engage private lawyers on behalf of tribals at the expense of the Government and thoroughly verify the records, no serious attempt had been made in this regard. The sincerity of the CPI(M) is being questioned now.

Mr. Karatam Rambabu, a staunch supporter of non-tribals, has alleged that the pro-tribal, groups are more interested in making money than doing anything good for the tribals.

A section of the press also drew flak for coverage of the tribal problem. Mr. Madakam Venkateswara Rao told the officials that certain news reports had shown tribals in poor light. In a particular case, tribals were reported to have destroyed 20 acres of sugarcane crop. In fact, the field was intact, he said.

Plea to post special officers for land cases

The Hindu, Saturday, February 15, 1997.

Eluru, Feb. 14 : The district secretary of the CPI(M), Mr. R. Satyanarayana Raju, and the divisional president of Vyavasaya Karmika Sangham, Mr. Anne Venkateswara Rao, have urged the Government to post special officers to all districts to deal with cases of surplus land and land assignment to the poor.

Talking to reporters here on Friday, they observed that the district administration, which was burdened with routine affairs, was unable to pay due attention to the land issues. Also, constitution of exclusive benches for surplus land matters would go a long way in clearing the stockpile of surplus land cases and speed up land distribution in the State. They wanted adequate legal support to the poor to fight cases in courts.

Accusing the State Government of lacking sincerity in the implementation of land reforms in the true spirit. Mr. Satyanarayana Raju, reasoned that poor people did not support the Janmabhoomiprogramme whole-heartedly because the Government failed to address the problems of the downtrodden. Instead of ensuring livelihood to all and providing land to the poor, the Government resorted to Janmabhoomi which was, according to him, eye an wash.

He alleged that whole administration was functioning according to the whims of ruling party MLAs.

Mr. Anne Venkatreswara Rao .. the State Agriculture Minister, K. Vidyadhara Rao, with flouting Government orders on assigning Government land in Ayyaparajugudem of lingapalem mandal. He stated that while the Government decided some time ago to constitute an all-party panel to pitch the beneficiaries, the Minister influenced the Revenue Divisional Officer to issue pattas to the people of his choice. Following a representation, the RDO's action was stayed by the Joint Collector.

 
 
^Top