logo

Requirements

Get Adobe Flash player


AN ESSENTIAL GUIDE ON THE UTILIZATION OF THE GODAVARI WATERS AND RESOURCES


 The RoFR act recognizes the dwelling site, religious places, burial grounds, village council sites along with places of MFP, water resources, biodiverisity etc and also PVT tenures. As the implementation boils down to title deeds for house sites and lands under cultivation, SAKTI engaged the Chenchu youth to document their traditional knowledge in their idiom and dialect, in encouraging them to assert as inborn foresters, capable of managing these resources as envisaged in the Act.


"Since SAKTI activities are mostly issue based and covering a large area, here we concentrate on the forest-related programmes of SAKTI for the present study."


  

The Tribal Struggle for Property Rights

-Arun Kumar


SAKTI: Review Report by: Mukta Srivastava, Programme Officer, Oxfam GB in India - Hyderabad . DATE : 20-25 November 2002

 


RECONSTRUCTING A HISTORY OF LAND,

DISPOSSESSION OF ADIVASI LAND IN THE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT OF A.P.

Bhukya Bhangya

Asst. Professor of History

Nizam College,

Osmania University,

Hyderabad

Read full article


 

SI.No.

W.P.No.

Petitioner & Respondents

Relief sought / Relief granted

Filing/ Disposal/

Follow -up

1

M.c.no.6 of 1988

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju

 


    

Relief Granted : The first petitioner is not a legally wedded wife of the respondent. The petitioner's contention is that the respondent was habiting with her the promise that he would marry her and as a result of such union,the second petitioner was born.The respondent denied the allegation made against him by the first petitioner.

             The petitioner u/s 488 Cr.P.C is dismissed as the componants as mentioned in section 488 Cr.P.C are not found in this case - Sub divisional megistrate , Rampachodavaram.

Dt - 31st july 1989

 

Order

2

Criminal revision Petition no.97/89

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju

 

 

Order

3

Cr.R.P.No.

182/90

Cr.R.C.No.183/90

 

A.R.R.

1.Vempa Gangamma

2.Nageswara rao

Vs

State & Redlam Satyanarayana
    

 

Relief Sought :  To grant mainenance.

 

Relief Granted: after weighting all the evidence do herebyorder that the respondent redium satyanarayana has to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs.300/- per month to P.W.1 and Rs.200/- per month to p.w.2 from the date of Judgement. - sub divisional court 20th Nov 1987.

Order : "setting aside the order passed by the sub-divisional magistrate.date : 03-Oct-1988.

Addl sessions Judge,Rajahmandry"

Highcourt Order : The appellate court found that there is the marriage btw the 1st petitioner and the 2nd respondent and disallowed her claim.So far as the paternity of the child is concerned,the lower appallate court ought to have remanded the matter to the original court to give an opportunity to both the parties. As illegetimate son,petitioner no.2 is entitled for maintenance.In the case of illicit intimacy,certain oral avidence has to be required,particular, as this incident is said to have taken place in a tribal area where we cannot expect documentary evidance. Therefore,the lower appellate court's finding with regard to petitioner no.2 is concerned has been set aside and the matter is remanded to the original court for disposing of the claim of petitioner no.2 after considering for disposing of the claim of petitioner no.2 after considering the avidence already on record and the evidence that is being produced by both the parties,so far as petitioner no.1 is concerned,no case is made out for interference.

Date : 14th August 1991.

Direction on 14-08-1991

remanded to SDC court R.Chodavaram

Both parties compromised in the court

4

CRL.M.P.No.549 of 1993

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju


    

Interim Directions : Pakalapati suryanarayana Raju alongwith the petitioners in Crl.P.No.549/93 shall present themselves before the authorities,C.C.M.B. tomorrow,i.e 9-7-1993 and sri A.Ramalingeswararao,learned counsel for petitioners shall accompany them and pay the neccessory fees payable for tests. If the C.C.M.S. authorities direct them to come on any other day,the parties should go there on the date fixed. The 8th July 1993

 

CCMB : "I regret that DNA fingerprinting services from the CCMB are not avoilable."

 

Director

Prof D Balasubramanian

July 13,1993

 

Order : There must be corroboration to the intimate relationship. In view of the absence of corroborative evidence, the finding of the courts below that the petitioners failed to establish the paternity of the second petitioner cannot be interfared with.

 

 

 

Order

 

News

5

CRL.P.NO.549 of 1993

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju


    

 

 

Order

6

CRL.P.NO.549 of 1993

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju


    

 

 

Order

7

Crl.M.P.No. 676 of 1993

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju


    

 

 

Order

8

Criminal misc.petition no.1782 of 1993

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju


    

 

 

Order

9

Center for cellular and molecular biology,13-07-1993

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju


    

 

 

Order

10

Criminal petition no.549 of 1993

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju


    

 

 

Order

11

Crl.p No.549/93

 

A.R.R.

P.Lakshmi

Vs

Pakalapati suryanarayana raju
    

Relief Sought :  To call for the records...

Relief Granted: "CCMB declined to take up DNA test. The case was dismissed"

Disposed On : 20-Nov-1995

12

M.C.No.8/94

Patara buramma

Vs

Eedala paddaraju
    

Relief Granted: maintenance granted - sub divisional megistrate-rampachodavaram, Date 7th Apr 1994

Disposed

13

M.C.no.11/95

Patara buramma

Vs

Eedala paddaraju


    

Relief Granted: Dismissed - second additional JFC megistrate, Rajahmaundry.

Disposed

14

Crl.Mp.no.2253/97

Patara buramma

vs

Eedala paddaraju


    

Relief Sought: that this hon'ble court may be pleased to direct the respondent to appear for the D.N.A test before the central for cellular and molecular biology,Hyderabad to establish that he is the father of minor children ramayamma and lakshmi,pending disposal of the revision petition in the interest of justice.

Date:March 1987.

Relief Granted : The marriage of the petitioner with RW-1 is pleased,but not proved.There is no evidence to show that the children were born through the respondent.The learned council for the petitioner submits that the girls studied up to seventh class.In such a case, there should not have been any difficulty for the petitioner to produce school certificate to prove that the children were born through the respondent who is the father and that affort is not made.Therefore, the lower court rightly disallowed the maintenance case.There are no grounds to interfere.Hence,the criminal revision case is dismissed.

Date: The 9th April of 1999

----- The High Court of A.P.

Disposed

 
   

 

W.P. No. 5515/87 M.P.No.7398/87 Date:May 1987

W.P. No. 6175/87 M.P.No.8273/87 Date:May 1987

 "Managing Director Godavari plywoods ltd. Rampachodavaram E.G.Dt. be and hereby is directed not to cut any mango trees, jamun and jack trees and cutting the forests of Maredumilli mandal, E.G.Dt."

 Only matured or dying trees were to be felled. Jeelugu (Caryota urens) palm, trees yielding minor forest produce like tamarind or cane brakes, creepers were not to be touched. A gap of 20 meters from a stream.)         --Times of India, April 30, 1991.

 

The candidate has chosen a topical subject, very relevant to our thinking on culture, cognition and language. He has red widely and is familiar with the literature that matters. His linguistic and anthropological reasoning is sound. His language is clear and simple.

...evidence of the investigator's ability as a linguist by special training and as a linguistic anthropologist by self - cultivated interest.

Prof. A.Munirathnam Reddy, Head, Department of Social Anthropology,S.V.University, Tirupati - 517502

 

Enabling the Community to Gain Command Over the Administrative Process is Empowerment.

 

"Today the development is manaement without governance and governanace is without proper participation."

 

 

A.P.Cabinet Sub - Committee Report on Left Wing Extrremists. - P.Sivaramakrishna.

The only information the government or media always compile carefully is on Naxalite encounters, never the violations of the instruments of rule of law such as minimum wages, fifth schedule, mismanagement of forests, equity in the distribution of welfare benefits, displacement, fragmentation of Socio-economic entities etc. 

        

INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE ORDER

if the R & R is found to be lagging with reference to the fixed bench marks, the construction should accordingly be deferred / stopped;

FORESTS ARE RESERVOIRS OF WATER AND LUNGS OF OUR ENVIRONMENTS.

SAVE THEM FROM MINING AND DESTRUCTION.

Click here to Bauxite Case: Read full article.