S.No./

Case No.

Petitioners/Respondents

Relief sought/ Relief Granted

Filing/ Disposal/

Follow-up

1

CCLAs

L3/588/90

W.P.13116/90

SAKTI

Vs.

Pattadars

Pattadars

Vs

CCLA and SAKTI

Representation for suo-moto revision under section 453 of regulation 2 of 1969 filed before the commissioner of survey, settlements and land records Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad

Relief sought: Directing to stay all further proceedings, pursuant to the notice said to have been issued by the respondent no.1.

Relief Granted: "It is very doubtful whether the first respondent (LTR) would initiate suo-motu revisional proceedings. Except the apprehension of the petitioners, there is no record to show that 1 st respondent has initiated revisional proceedings in the matter. Inview of the circumstances. I do not find any ground to grant relief as prayed. Accordingly the W.P.in dismissed. How every it is open at the petitioner to agitate the matter as and when the proceeding are initiated by the 1 st respondent".

Disposed on 25-09-90

2

CSS &LR's Ref.L3/1140/92 dt.21.9.97

•  Sri Badireddi Tatarao

•  Badireddi Simhachalam

Vs

•  Project Officer, ITDA

R.Chodavaram.and another

Relief Granted: " The purported receipts do not indicate the S.Nos., or local names of the land in respect of which the payment is accepted. The same claimants who stated before the spl.dy.tahsildar, and Special Tahsildar that they have no lease documents or receipts with them in support of their claims produced the same before the S.O., bearing tell-tale evidence in both cases of over-writing against Eksala entry and interpolation of the date in the first case. The S.O.,, did not verify the relevant Estate/village records nor the claimants produced the certified copies there of before the collector or this court which leads to one to believe that the documents produced are false and created for getting patta.

Thus there are no merits in the appeals which are dismissed."

3

CSS&LR's

L3/1142/92 Dt.12.9.1997

Nemala Tarakamma

Vs

•  Project Officer, ITDA

R.Chodavaram.and another

4

New Number:

CCLAs ref.No.L3/175/

2000

Dt:23-11-2000

Sakti

Vs

Chintalapudi pattadars

Relief sought: For patta cancellation

***

Relief Granted : "The purported receipts do not indicate the S.Nos. or local names of the land in respect of which the payment is accepted. The same claimants who stated before the Spl.Dy.Tahsildar, and Special Tahsildar that they have no lease documents or receipts with them in support of their claims produced the same before the S.O., bearing tell-tale evidence in both cases of over-writing against Eksale entry and interpolation of the date in the first case. The S.O., did not verify the relevant Estate/village records nor the claimants produced the certified copies there of before the Collector or this court which leads to one to believe that the documents produced are false and created for getting patta.

Thus there are no merits in the appeals which are dismissed".