S.No./ W.P.No. |
Petitioner & Respondents |
Relief sought / Relief granted |
Filing/ Disposal/ Follow -up |
1.WRIT PETITION No. 8476 of 2001. |
S.C.POTHARAJU DORA & ANOTHER V/S THE DIST.COLLECTOR.,E.G.DIST.& 4 OTHERS. |
Relief Granted : No further directions are required to be issued. No further monitoring of the case is necessary. The proceedings are accordingly closed.
|
|
1 W.P.M.P No. 27257 of 2002
Surampalem case K.S.M |
Between: Patara Venkata Ramana and 12 others … Petitioners (Petitioners in W.P.No.21768 of The District Collector, East Godavari district at kakinada And 4 others |
Relief Sought : to direct the respondent to make alternative arrangements for providing land in substitution of loss of land due to digging of the canals in Chinnempalem village, Gangavaram mandal, E.G. District as par of rehabilitation in line with the G.O.64 and pass such or further orders. Relief Granted:Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to expedite and complete the settlement operations determining the title of the land to the eligible persons who are entitled to get the pattas by settling the Mukhasas and after completion of the settlement, the title holders of the land shall be paid compensation under the Land Acquisition Act and other benefits without any further delay. No order as to costs. |
Disposed On : 21-Aug-2008
|
2 W.P.No.
K.S.M |
Between 1. Parada Lakshmi 2. Kurram Rajamani, And 1. Union of India, 2. Government of Andhra Pradesh, 3. Superintendent Engineer, 4. Executive Engineer, 5. District Collector, 6. District Forest Officer, 7. Superintendent of Police, |
Relief Sought : Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring action of the respondents 2 to 7 in going ahead with the works pertaining to Bhoopatipalem Reservoir at Bhoopatipalem Village, Rampachodavaram Mandal, East Godavari District without obtaining the permission from R1 under the provisions of the Forest (Conservation) act, 1980 is illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to start the works only after clearance obtained from the R1 and after making copy of the permission available with all the Gram Shabhas of the effected villages. Relief Granted: Recording the submission, the Writ Petition is closed. It is made clear that the forest land, which is the subject matter of this writ petition, shall not be put to any non forest use, except in accordance with the provisions of the Act. There shall be no order as to costs. |
Disposed On : 28-Jan-2005
|
3 W.P.M.P.No.27114 of 2004 |
Sakti Vs Govt. of A.P. Rep.Its prl.Secretary Social welfare hyderabad And 5 others |
Relief Sought : Declaring the action ...
|
Next Date Of Listing : 24-Feb-2005
PENDING |
4 W.P.NO. 11970 OF 2004
|
Between: "SAKTI" a voluntary Social Organisation And 1. Union of India Represented by its Secretary |
Relief Sought :For the reasons stated in the acccompanying affidavit, the above named petitioner prays that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to prepare a Resettlement and Rehabilitation Package for the Project Affected Families of Khairguda Open Cast Project of Bellampalli region of Adilabad District of the 7th respondent in the light of the National Policy of Resettlement and Rehabilitation for project Affected Families 2003 and the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in AIR 1997 SC 3297 and implement the same within a time frame and pass such other orders as this Hon’ble court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Relief Granted :
|
|
5 W.P.M.P.No.27114 of 2004 |
Between |
|