Search
LIST OF ARTICLES
- Video's
- Data Base on Godavari Basin
- Conserving the Forest
- Tribal Land Rights
- Governance of Natural Resources
- G.O./N.G.O.
- Chenchu Empowerment
- Minimum Wages
- Weighing Balances
- Studies and Reports
- Court Cases (PIL)
- Protecting Human Rights
- Disaster Preparedness
- Noorinti Adavi
- Evaluations
- Bio-diversity
- Photo Gallery
- Tribal Culture
- Publications
- Rampa News
- Mines & Tribes
- Gender Justice
Miscellaneous
S.No./ W.P.No. |
Petitioners & Respondents |
Relief sought /Relief Granted |
Filing/ Disposal Follow-up |
1. W.P.No.3664 of 1970 (Panchayatiraj) |
Between :
And 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented 2. The District Collector (Planning) 3. The Election Officer, (Asst. Director) 4. Undavalli Manikyam, S/o Subba Rao, 5. Yellapalli Virabhadra Rao, Vice- 6. Cheppa Nookaraju, President, Rajavommangi, 7. Pothubandi China Musalaiah, Sarpanch, 8. Sitarapu Naganna, Sarpanch, Labbarthi, 9. Pallidemudu, Sarpanch, Thantikonda 10. Gontireddy Vasanta Rayudu, Sarpanch, 11. Veerareddy Satyanarayana, Sarpanch, |
Relief Sought: To restrain the Respondents 4 to 11 from continuing in their offices and from discharging their duties by virtue of their election to the said offices whoa are not legally elected, pending the disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. |
|
1. W.P.No. (Human Rights) |
Sakthi Vs the Deputy secretary to Govt. social welfare (T) Dept , |
Relief Sought : To issue a writ order particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in issuing Memo No.537/T1/88-1.dt,\.2-7-1988 as illegal and void and pending disposal of the writ petition to suspend the respondent. *** |
Filed on 22-10-88 Disposed On : 26-Jun-1992 |
3. (Co-operatives) |
SAKTI V/s State of A.P. & others |
Relief Sought: To hold election to the 28 primary societies affiliated to the Girijana Co-operative Corporation ltd. in the state of A.P.
Relief Granted: Directed to conduct the elections |
Elections were conducted Disposed On : 05-Jul-1994 |
2. (Karshaka parishat) |
SAKTI V/s State of A.P. & Others |
Relief Sought: Challenging the section 3,8 & 9 of the A.P.Rashtra karshaka ParishatThe ordinance promulgating the A.P.Rastra Karshaka Parishat was withdrawn. |
Disposed On : 04-Feb-1998 |
7. (Co-operatives) |
Sayaina Babu Rao, V/S • The Govt. of A.P. by its Secretary, Cooperative (Soceities) Dept. Secretarirat, Hyderabad . • The Registrar of Cooperative Societies, A.P., Hyderabad .
|
Relief Granted: " The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to take a final decision to amend the Rule 22(A) of the A.P.Co-operative Societies Rules, 1964 to facilitate reservation of seats of Director for PA.C.S. to scheduled Tribe candidates. This Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to take a final decision regarding the amendment as expeditiously as possible and communicate the same to the petitioner." |
Disposed on 6.2.2001 |
7. W.P.14275 (Civil courts in tribal areas) |
Between: Asu Nagamma, d/o. Late Borraiah,
2. The Secretary to Government of A.P., Law, Legislative Affairs & Justice Home (Courts-C) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
|
Relief Sought : circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 & 2 in establishing and continuing the 4th respondent (Mobile court) by appointing Revenue Divisional officer as sub-divisional Magistrate at Bhadrachalam, Khammam District, which is an agency area by issuing G.O.Ms.No.406, Home (Courts-A) Department, dt.27-06-1990, G.O.Rt.No.1471, Home (Courts-A) Department, dated. Relief Granted : It is needless to direct that the Government shall take an appropriate decision in the matter in the light of the recommendations of the committee and the views of the Tribes Advisory Council. For the present, we are not inclined to issue any directions in this regard. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. |
|
8. (Tribewise seat allotment in school of exllence) |
BHUKYA KISHAN NAIK & ANOTHER, V/S TRIBAL WELFARE DEPT., REP. BY PRL. SEC. & 4 ORS,
|
Relief Granted: " The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to take a final decision to amend the Rule 22(A) of the A.P.Co-operative Societies Rules, 1964 to facilitate reservation of seats of Director for PA.C.S. to scheduled Tribe candidates. This Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to take a final decision regarding the amendment as expeditiously as possible and communicate the same to the petitioner." |
Disposed On : 21-Sep-2006
|
9. (Panchayathiraj) |
Between: 1. "DHIMSA". a society registered under 2.SAKTI …..PETITIONERS AND1. Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its 2. State Election Commission 3. Commissioner for Panchayatraj,
|
Relief Sought : pleased to consider this additional Affidavit along with the Writ Petition and pass such further and other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.
|
|
9. W.P.No.14136 of 2006 (Panchayathiraj) |
G. CHINNA RAO, E.G. DIST. V/S GOVT. OF A.P. PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPT. & 2 OTHERS
|
Relief Sought :To issue any appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring Sec. 242D of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 as unconstitutional and void as it violates Sec. 4 of the Provisions of Panchyat Raj (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act 1996 and 243M (b) of the Constitution of India and consequently hold all the elections to the Z.P.T.Cs. and M.P.T.Cs. held in 20066 under the said Section and Rules made there |
