S.No./ W.P.No. |
Petitioners & Respondents |
Relief sought / Relief Granted |
Filing/ Direction/ |
01. WPMP |
-do- |
Relief Sought by respondents 5 and 6: to vacate the interim order in W.P.M.P.No.10794/92 in W.P.No.8737/92,dt 15-7-92 |
|
02. |
Smt.Rajulamma (tribal) |
|
Dismissed |
03. WPMP No.3108/93 WPMVP No.315/92 |
Kalumukota Nukaraju
4. The Project Officer ITDA Rampachodavaram on behalf of Kunjam peda Abbayi |
Relief Sought: (WPMP.3108/93) To implead the petitioner as respondent No.4.
Relief Sought: (WVMP.315/92) to vacate the stay granted in WPMP No.6426/92 in W.P.No.5079/92 |
filed on 1-3-93
|
04. |
Manganti Demuthi & Jiyanna |
|
Disposed On : 11-Nov-1994 |
05.
|
L.Venkata Raju
|
Brief Note: Originally this land belongs to tribal herein. But the non-tribals falsely got issued settlement patta the same was cancelled by the Dist.Collector (Director of Settlement) agrived by the said order. The non-tribal filed writ petition questioning the validity of G.O.MS.No.741/92. Relief Sought: Call for records relating to Appeal No.5/91 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the order in appeal No.5/91 dt.28-3-1992 passed by the 2nd respondent herein
|
Filed on 15-4-92
Direction on 4.4.94 land restored to tribals.
Disposed On : 04-Apr-1994 |
06. LTRP No. 250/88 |
B.Appa Rao,
|
Relief Sought: Call for records relating to Appeal No.5/91 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the order in appeal No.5/91 dt.28-3-1992 passed by the 2nd respondent herein |
Direction on 4.4.94
Disposed On : 04-Apr-1994 |
07. |
Chepa Seetayamma |
|
W.A.Pending Disposed On : 16-Mar-1994 |
08. W.P.No.4661 of 1995 |
Senapathi Apparao and 2 others. |
Relief Sought: pleased to order Stay of our eviction from the land measuring Ac.4.00 cents in S.No.26/3A and 26/33 of Pidathamamidi village, Gangavaram mandal, E.G.District.pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such further or other orders as may be deeded fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. |
Filed on 10-03-1995
PENDING |
09. |
K.Venkataram Chowdary |
Impleaded |
Pending |
10. |
Maganti Denulu |
Relief Granted:” Remanded to SDM Court, Rampa Chodavaram for fresh enquiry”. |
Pending at SDM Court Rampachodavaram. |
11. |
Chapa Seethayamma, Singampalli |
Relief Granted: “The W.P. disposed of with a direction to pass appropriate order with in a period of four months”. |
Disposed off in favour of tribals. Disposed On : 22-Jul-1996 |
12. C.M.A. No. L.T.R. NO. 376/84 A.R.R. |
Palli Ramulu (Non-tribal)
|
|
Disposed On : 04-Dec-1996 |
13. LTRP No. 49/96 |
Vs |
Brief Note: the petition scheduled land registered in the name of Kambam Samayya from him the fatehr of the petitioner herein purchased in the year without agent to the government permission hence LTRPNo.49/90 filed by the tribals herein is the allowed aggrived by the said order non-tribal an appeal in CMA No.50/90 it was also dismissed on that this writ petition filed and got obtained the stay order in WPMP No.30438/95 on that W.V.MP.No.2869/96 stay vacate petition filed. Relief Sought: to grant stay of our eviction from the land measuring Ac,1.25 cents in S.No.9/7 of Gondolu village Addateegala mandal |
Filed on 19-10-95
Disposed on 29-12-96 |
14. |
Vs |
Brief Note: the petition scheduled land registered in the name of Kambam Samayya from him the petitioner herein said have been purchaged in the year 1932 the permission was not obtained. Inturn leased out the land to Gonney Baburao hence LTRP no.48/95 is allowed. Aggrived by the order file appeal CMA No. 51/91 the same was also dismissed. On that this petition was filed.
Relief Granted: “dismissed as the remedy of revision is available to the petitioners”. |
Filed on 11-10-95
Direction on 29-12-96 |
15. WPMP |
Kalumukota Nookaraju |
Relief Sought: (WPMP.11605/95) To implead the petitioner as 3rd respondent. |
Filed on March1995 It is Pending |
16. C.SS & LR's Case No.L3/1140/92,Dt.12.09.1997 |
Between:
W/o. Nukaraju ... Appellants. AND
R.Chodavram.
S/o. Nukayya s |
Relief Granted: The purported receipts do not indicate the S.Nos., or local names of the land in respect of which the payment is accepted. The same claimants who stated before the Spl.Dy.Tahsildar, and Special Tahsildar that they have no lease documents or receipts with them in support of their claims produced the same before the S.O., bearing tell-tale evidence in both cases of over-writing against Eksala entry and interpolation of the date in the first case. The S.O., did not verify the relevant Estate/Village Records nor the claimants produced the certified copies there of before the Collector or this Court which leads to one to believe that the documents produced are false and created for getting patta. |
|
17. |
Datla Venkatapathi raju, Rajavommangi |
Relief Granted: “WP disposed of with a direction to the secretary to Govt. to issued fresh notice on disposed of the case with in weeks from the date of and GOMS. No. 47, dt. 17.4. 97”. |
Writ petition pending Disposed On : 30-Apr-1997 |
18. 4 |
Vs
|
Brief Note: In 1933 RSR the plaint schedule lands are registered in the name of Parisika Pakeeru (tribal) but this lands under possession and enjoyment of Non-tribals petitioner herein the possession of the non-tribal are void under agency regulation as such LTRP No.18/89 filed by Parisika Pakeeru is allowed agrived by the said order this petition is filed by non-tribals. On 6.3.95 Legal Heir petition filed by Parisika Parvathamma after death of Parisika Pakeeru. Note: In election petition O.P.No.2/87 decided that Padala family belongs to Kapu community. Relief Sought: calling for the records relating to LTRP No.18/89, examine the same and quash the same as highly illegal, arbitrary, high-handed, biased and void |
Filed on 11-6-1989.
Judgement was given with a direction to SDC
Disposed On : 27-Nov-1997 |
19. LTRP NO. 196/88 |
1.Maganti Satyanarayana
|
Brief Note: Originally this land belongs to grand father of Pamarthi Krishna LTR Order is given in favour of tribal in LTRP No.196/88 aggrived by the said order. Non-tribals file this writ petition. Relief Sought: to stay dispossession to the petitioners from their land measuring Ac.10-98 in S.No.14/1, 3 and 4 of Patharamavaram village,Gangavaram mandal, E.G.Dist. |
Filed on 9-12-88.
It is Pending
Disposed On : 06-Mar-1998 |
20. |
1.Pallala Subba Reddy |
Relief Sought: memoramdum of grounds of Civil Revision Petition against the proceedings in O.S.No.16/97 on file of the 1st respondent |
Filed on February 1998
Disposed On : 04-Feb-1998 |
21. |
R.M.Yerram Raju,
|
Brief Note: Nellipudi and Kurambondi villages of Gangavarma mandal are Mukhasa villages. Petitioner herein is sanda to Mukhasa villages. Mukhasa and Muttas are abolish under regulation 2 of 1969 the government issued the notice to petitioners as per GOMSNo.855 Dt.29.6.91 to handover the lands. As per our cases concerned grand father of Patara Gangaraju and Patara Vasarao (tribals) of Chinmpalem cultivated this land by podu cultivation. Hence implead petition filed. Relief Sought: to quash the G.O.M.S.No. 855-Revenue Departjment dt.26-9-1991 issued by the Govt. of A.P,Hyd. And for a consequential direction, directing the Respondents herein not to interfere with the uninterrupted possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s village. |
Filed on 23-11-91.
Direction on 3.7.1999
Disposed On : 23-Jul-1999 |
22. |
Datla Venkatapathi Raju, |
|
for orders on 12.10.2000 |
23. |
Kalimikota Rajulamma |
Relief Sought: I submit that I am a scheduled tribe women fighting for the last 15 years for my land. The writ petitioner is a non-tribal who occupied vast extents of land and I am not able to fight against him due to lack of finances and knowledge of court proceedings. The above facts would have come to light had the government filed counter giving the particulars of the cases. I seek indulgence of this Hon’ble court for not being able to give full particulars of the cases when the above writ petition came up for orders on 12.02.1999. It is therefore just and necessary that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order in W.P.No.13933 of 1998. Otherwise I would suffer serious and irreparable loss. |
Filed on April 1999
Disposed On : 17-Jul-2001 |
24. W.A.No.238/2000 in W.P.No.13933/98 |
And
|
Relief Granted: “In the result and for the foregoing reasons. We cannot sustain the order of the learned single Judge. Accordingly, the writ appeal is allowed and the order of the learned single Judge dated 12.2.1999 is set aside and Writ Petition No.13933 of 1998 is dismissed with no order as to coss. As a consequence thereof. It is now oppen to the Spl.Dy.Collector (TW), Rampachodavara, the 1st appellant herein to take further steps pursuasnt to the notice in Form E issued to the 1st respondent under ~~Rule 7(2) of the Rules, in accordance with law. |
Order Dated: 13-06-2002 Disposed On : 13-Jun-2002 |
25. |
Bantupalli Appa Rao,
|
Brief Note: the Petitioners reagitated the matter that is already dismissed by this Hon’ble court in W.P.No.5079/92 & 5630/92. |
Filed on 18-8-94.
It is Pending.
Disposed On : 25-Mar-2004 |
26. W.P.No.2527 of 2003 84
|
Chodi Narasanna Dora |
Relief Sought: to direct the authorities to immediately construct houses for the petitioner along with ogther similarly placed persons in Kothada village, Gangavaram mandal, residing in chodi veedhi and Tekula veedhi while considerin the representation submitted by the petitioner on 6.11.2002. and other villagers, pending W.P.No.2527 of 2003 on the file of the High Court. Relief Granted: The court while directing issue of notrice to the Respondents herein to show cause why this application should not be complied with made the following order. (Receipt of the order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case). |
Order Date: 10-02-2003.
Disposed On : 02-Apr-2004 |
27.
|
LolabhattaVenkata Raju |
Brief Note: the Petitioners reagitated the matter that is already dismissed by this Hon’ble court in W.P.No.5079/92 & 5630/92. |
Filed on 10-8-1994. Disposed On : 25-Mar-2004 |
28. |
Datla Venkatapathi Raju |
|
Disposed On : 02-Sep-2004 Order Details |
28. |
Datla Venkatapathi raju, |
|
Disposed On : 02-Sep-2004 |
29. |
Karukonda Naga Raju
|
Brief Note: Originally this land belongs to Parsika Bullodu who is father of the respondent herein he sold the lands to non-tribals this transcation took place without the permission of the agent to government hence LTRP NO.60/90 filed by respondent herein is allosed. Agrived by the order petitioner herein preferred an appeal before agent to government in CMA No.31/91 it is also dismissed. On that he file the writ petition and got stay order in W.P.M.P.No.11375/94 stating that he belongs to Kondakapu caste. Relief Sought: Declaring that the Judgement of the 1st respondent in C.M.A No.31/91 dt 19-10-1993 confirming the orders of the 2nd respondent in L.T.R.P.No.60/90 dt. 19-2-91 as highly illegal, unjust and void and consequently set aside the same. |
Filed on 9-5-1994.
Disposed On : 02-Sep-2004
|
30. |
Detla Venkatapathi Raju |
|
Disposed On : 02-Sep-2004 ORDER DETAILS |
31. LTRP No. 186/78 |
Ballula Veeraswamy
|
Vakalat filed |
Pending
Disposed On : 24-Oct-2005 |
32. |
Koppu Rajulu
|
Brief Note: regarding survey No.53/1 is stands registered in the name of Koppu Rajappa who is grand father of Rajulu but the land is in the possession and enjoyment of Gollapalli narasimhamurthy who is a non-tribal. The SDC court in LTRP NO.2/91 held that Koppu Rajulu is belongs to Mala community. Hence the transaction held in this case was not void. But the predecessors of same court in LTRP no.179/80 observed that Koppu Rajulu is belongs to Valmiki (ST) aggrived by the order in LTRP No.2/91 prefere an appeal No. 30/95 before Agent to govt. The same was dismissed. Stating that he failed to explain delay infiling appeal on that this petition filed. Relief Sought: calling for the records relating to C.M.P No. 20/95 in C.MA.No. 30/95 dt. 18-12-1995 passed by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal and viod consequently direct the first respondent to take up the appeal filed by petitioner on file and dispose of the same in accordance with law |
filed on April 1996 It is pending
Disposed On : 27-Feb-2006
|
33. |
Rajavommangi |
Relief Sought: Declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 in not ordering eviction of the R3 from all the land in Survey No.354/2 extending up to Ac.13.17 in Rajavommangi, Rajavommangi mandal, E.G.District as unconstitutional and consequently declare that no govt. land can be allowed to be in the possession of the non-tribal and consequently set aside that part of the final order of R1 in CMA No.7/98 wehich permits the R3 to retain the Ac.6.00 in Survey No. 354/2 in Rajavommangi, Rajavommangi mandal, E.G.Dist and pass such order or other orders as deemed fit in the interest of justice. |
Filed on 29-08-05
Disposed On : 30-Aug-2007
|
34.
|
Vs
|
Brief Note: Petitioner herein obtained settlement patta the same was cancelled (Director of Settlement) aggrived by the said order she filed a writ petition and obtained interim stay in W.P.No.10794/92.
|
Filed on 14-7-92
Direction on 14-07-92.
Disposed On : 25-Aug-2009
ORDER DETAILS |
35. |
Peta Ramulu and others |
impleaded. |
Disposed On : 01-Jul-2009 |
36.
|
Between:Chikkala Rupavathi @ Satyavathi, W/o. Kamaraju, ..... PETITIONER AND1.The Additional Agent to Government,East Godavari District, Ramapachodavaram. District. Rajavommangi Mandal, East Godavari District. Welfare Department, Secretariat, at Hyderabad.
|
Relief Sought : The petitioner in W.P.No.20998 of 2007 was in possession and enjoyment of Acs.2.64 cents of land in Survey No.241/3 of Jaddangi Village of Rajavommangi Mandal in East Godavari District. Respondents 4 and 5 therein approached the Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare), Rampachodavaram – the 2nd respondent herein, by filing L.T.R.P.No.150 of 2002 for eviction of petitioner from the land. The 2nd respondent dismissed the L.T.R.P. through order dated 22.02.2002. Aggrieved thereby, respondents 4 and 5 filed C.M.A.No.49 of 2005 before the Additional Agent to the Government, Rampachodavaram – the 1st respondent herein. The appeal was allowed on 06.01.2007. The petitioner states that though two months time is stipulated for filing revision before the Government, the Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajavommangi – the 3rd respondent herein evicted her on 07.01.2007 itself. She contends that such an action is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, apart from being contrary to the A.P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Rules, 1969 (‘the Rules, for brevity).
Relief Granted : Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the revisional authority i.e. the Government to dispose of the revisions filed by the petitioners within six (06) weeks from today. In case the revisions filed by the petitioners are not disposed of despite the petitioners being ready to cooperate, the 1st respondent in all the writ petitions, i.e., the Additional Agent to the Government, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District shall be under the obligation to re-induct the petitioners into possession of the land, duly issuing notices to the effected parties. There shall be no order as to costs. |
Order Case details |